Bhumihar and Sakaldwipi
Dear Brahmins It is interesting to note that Sakaldwipi Brahmins claims that Chankaya was a brahmin-possible. Bhumihars claims that Chankya was a Bhumihar with the fact that there are some bhumihars who associates themselves with Chanak. Buchanan calls Bhumihar as Magadh Brahmins and Military Brahmin Whereas the word Maga or Magadh is totaly associated with Sakaldwipi brahmins. I dont know about the history of Sakaldwipi or Bhumihar, but at the moment Sakaldwipis are Purohits for all the brahmins including Bhumihars. Kanyakubja Brahmins claims superior to a sakaldwipi but fact is that due to knowledge, wisdom and scholistic approach Sakaldwipi has high status. Bhumihar brahmins are landlord perform three duties prescribed for a brahmin. Originally the are Jujhootiya ( Warrier) and that is the reason a Jujhoutiya Brahmin Sahjananda Sarswati led Bhumihar Brahmin moovement. Swamiji was not against Sakaldwipi rather he was trying to unite all brahmins and farmers. It is difficult to know about Chankaya sect but Chankya was a Brahmin accepted. Kanyakubja has a great history and they are Panktipavan because of the fact that most of them are agriculrist or farmers. Saldwipi brahmin is my Purohit. I am a Bhumihar and we had a kanyakubja priest who was coming from Aara. But later when he was unable to come, We invited “Sakaldwipi Brahmins”. In my village Zamindar was Mr.Tiwari a kanyakubja brahmins,Jyestharaita (Big landowners)were Bhumihar and Sakaldwipi were purohit. No body is superior by caste. Janmana Jayate Sudra, Brahmansya sanskar Uchhayate.
Jnanabihin Brahmin Chandal hai.
I think. Suggestions are always welcome. Make a common ground for all brahmins.